What currency does the flow settle in?
USD, EUR, and other fiat legs change the providers that can serve a corridor. The asset is an input to provider eligibility, not a logo choice.
The asset you choose changes provider eligibility, reserve posture, chain support, and audit expectations. This guide avoids stale market data and focuses on the decision that changes the build.
USD, EUR, and other fiat legs change the providers that can serve a corridor. The asset is an input to provider eligibility, not a logo choice.
Fiat-backed, crypto-collateralized, issuer-led, and DAO-governed assets create different compliance and operational requirements.
A US domestic payout, EU redemption flow, and cross-border invoice do not use the same provider set.
The platform is useful at L1 directory depth, L2 credential depth, and L3 adapter execution. Today, most L3 money movement runs in simulation.
These examples are not rankings and not live market data. They are prompts for the provider eligibility conversation.
| Asset | When it may fit | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| USDC | US dollar flows where Base support and issuer documentation matter. | Confirm corridor providers and live credential status before production. |
| EURC | EUR-denominated flows where the asset choice changes jurisdiction and provider fit. | Liquidity and provider support can be narrower than USD assets. |
| DAI | Use when DAO-governed collateral and on-chain transparency are part of the product thesis. | Governance and collateral risk differ from fiat-backed issuer risk. |
Provider fit changes with sender, receiver, operator jurisdiction, fiat leg, and asset.
The selected asset becomes part of the context evaluated before a provider operation runs.
Reserve ratios, attestations, and current market caps require source ownership. This page does not publish them.